• Home
  • HotTopicsTalkRadio
  • RealWorldNews
  • UrbanSentinelLive
  • TrufBros
  • HTTR Store
  • ARCHIVES
  • ToniBreedlove
  • YvonneBaker
  • ReggieKearney
  • CharaAnnTappin
  • ChrisSmith
  • RichardHallJr
  • Yolanda'sMinistries
  • RESOURCES
  • REVIEWS
  • PHOTOS
  • JoinTheTeam
  • MEDIA
  • HTTRPressKit
The Hot Topics Talk Radio Network
Social Media:

Forty Acres and a Mule: Why it really matters

10/25/2015

0 Comments

 
I remember with amazing clarity watching the debate between Hillary Clinton and Rick Lazio when the two were running for the senate seat vacated by retiring New York Senator Patrick Daniel Moynihan in 2000. During that debate, both candidates disagreed on every subject with one exception. When questioned by a Black reporter, near the end, about their respective positions concerning reparations for Blacks, both said, “Get over it.”

Forty Acres and A Mule (FAAM) by today’s standards would certainly fetch a hefty price depending on location.  But in 1865, it was not about money, but about self-worth and opportunity. Take a trip with me and explore for a moment what ownership of forty acres and mule would have done for our ancestors and the impact it might have had on our lives today. FAAM would have allowed a man to feed his family by the sweat of his brow; would have made it possible for his wife and children to enjoy their own chitlins’ and their own pigs-feet, and not the trickle-down scraps from the master’s table; and would have rendered moot this cycle of dependency.

The docudrama “Banished”, a film by director Marco Williams airing on Starz Black Television this month in honor of Black History Month, explores African-American families expelled from their communities by the White majority residents. The story highlights the plight of many African-American families who were forced to abandon their homes and their lands under threat of death simply because of the color of their skin. The relationship here is that many or all of these lands were then taken over by whites under what is called “adverse possession.” Meaning that someone can claim property you forcibly abandoned, use it to their benefit and then have the legal system, they created, support their thievery. Sound familiar? Sounds eerily like slavery. Unfortunately, as was always the case, all of these cleansings were done under the guise that a black man had raped a white woman. 
False charges and historical patterns notwithstanding, it is the significance of the outcome where stories such as these, crystallize. Not only did the United States government renege on its [unofficial] policy of providing arable land to black former slaves, but for those blacks who were able to purchase and acquire land legally, their lands were stolen and subsequently passed down through white generations instead of black generations. FAAM would have given a black man’s children something to look forward too, and would probably have changed the lives of many blacks today regarding where they start and where they end up.

Melvin Oliver, a prominent sociologist says, “Wealth is not just about contemporary issues. It's also about the legacy of the past….African Americans have a history where there has been little wealth in the past, therefore making it more likely that there's little wealth in the future.” Unfortunately, we cannot live on “probably would haves”.  But somebody please, “Tell me again why we should forget?” 

Written by Jay Arrington, Staff Writer for the Maryland Daily Examiner

For information regarding Maryland Daily Examiner, contact Reggie Kearney, Editor-in-Chief.  
Click HERE for email. 

0 Comments

Cop Cancer: The Malignant Tumor of the African-American Community

8/2/2015

1 Comment

 

And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.                                                                                                                                                  Matthew 13:42

According to the CDC, cancer ranks as the second highest cause of death among African-Americans, natural deaths that is. But what about unnatural causes like death by what I like to call ‘Cop Cancer’ that old hide-in-plain-sight epidemic that has plagued African-Americans since reconstruction. For the record, where does that rank among cause of death for African-Americans? What are the symptoms? What are some of the preventive measures to avoid becoming a victim and what treatment is available?

Well, the first question is a bit difficult to answer because within the archives of denial there are no records to research. And besides, do we really expect the fox to admit to the number of chickens he killed? Do we really? The second question regarding symptoms, while still difficult is somewhat less difficult depending on the when and the where. For example:

1)      being harassed for no other reason that being African-American

2)      beaten on the side of the highway by a state trooper  

3)      being called out of your name

4)    taunted about your IQ

5)    slammed on the hood of a car or on concrete

6)    shot while standing on your front porch

7)    shot when officers raid the wrong home

8)    fired upon over 100 times as officers stand on the hood of your car

9)    shot and killed as you flee

10)  shot in the back as you lay on the ground

11)  killed in Walmart while a holding toy gun that the store sells

12)  being choked to death for selling loose cigarettes

13)  dying after having your spinal cord severed in the back of a police van

14)  dying in a jail cell after being arrested for failing to signal a lane change

15)  being shot in the head after being pulled over for lacking a front license plate

Shall I continue?

 
These types of things are nothing new or surprising to African-Americans, or to the majority of whites. Yeah, you all can feign shock and outrage all you want, but you’ve known all along. And you know how we know you’ve known? We know because the cancer has been left untreated and like a malignant tumor has spread leaving scores of African-American bodies in its wake.  You’ve cultivated and nurtured this cancer in your homes, in your schools, in policy and in the media. The difference now is that technology has created citizen journalists who for reasons of viral fame or whatever, record, posts and blast this cancer on social media for all the world to see.  Even so, video provides no guarantee that justice will prevail –for example the cases of Eric Garner and Rodney King.   

As for questions three and four, “What are some of the preventive measures to avoid becoming a victim and what treatment is available?”  Unless we can figure out a way to stop being African-American, I don’t see a viable solution other than prayer… AND PRAY, WE MUST!

If this were paper upon which I write, my tears would wet the page and so alas I stain my keyboard. I cry… no I weep - not so much because I hurt, but more so, because I despair of the fact that we digress and remove ourselves ever so farther away from the love and the unity we claim we seek.

I weep for the first African drawn and quartered in America - made an example to break the resistance of other slaves.

I weep for the countless lives lost in the name of misplaced delusions of grandeur.

I weep for Emmet Till.

I weep for the four little girls of Birmingham.

I weep for those hanged as strange fruit.

I weep for those that weep in solitude abandoned and alone in their jail cells.

I weep for the IRP6 and the Newburgh Four. I weep for the orphaned families.

I weep for those who have yet to know weeping. But mostly I weep for those whose weeping will be accompanied by the gnashing of teeth.

 

Written by Jay Arrington, Staff Writer for the Maryland Daily Examiner

For more articles and information regarding the Maryland Daily Examiner, contact Reggie Kearney, Editor-in-Chief (Email).  Or visit their website at: www.marylanddailyexaminer.com

 

Source: http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/populations/REMP/black.html#10

Picture
1 Comment

"CONVERSATIONS"

6/21/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
“Imagine if in this world we were all colorblind. If not one of us had any way of distinguishing of race. Oh my what a wonderful world this would be if somehow in our place and time we could live side by side in this world colorblind.” 
                               From the song “Colorblind” by Jay Arrington © Copyright 2011Poetry Emotion Productions, LLC

Raise your hand if you believe that what you contribute to society relative to your values is not a reflection of what you learned at home and be honest. Come on now. Let’s see a show of hands. Granted some of you did not grow up in a two-parent home or with your biological parents. Still, the odds favor that your values descend from your home and what you heard adults say about others, and their (adults) treatment of others. Mind you, these off-the-cuff descriptions and gestures might stem from road-rage incidents or an adult responding to a news story, a politician or a crime. However, the most likely venue for the majority of influence on your values were the conversations had around the dinner table.

Imagine a child sitting around the dinner table hearing his father referring to a co-worker as a “Jew Bastard” or her mother referring to a neighbor as a “Black Nigger Bitch.” You know what I mean don’t you? Fess’ up, we’ve all heard it before. Hell, as a black man I heard my father say “Jew Bastard” many times as I am sure many of you have heard someone say, “Nigger,” “Spic,” “Kike,” or “Wetback.” Chances are the majority of you first heard these words at home around the dinner table. A few years back I wrote a series titled “The Ape Story” about the pattern of learned behavior in the urban community, not that urban communities have a monopoly on setting bad examples but to offer a solution by identifying the problem.

Well folks, guess what? It ain’t only in urban communities. It’s in suburbia also and again if we are honest about it we must acknowledge that bad behavioral patterns have been alive and well in mainstream America (white households) for hundreds of years. In fact, most of the bad behaviors present in urban communities are a by-product of blacks’ assimilation of white societal behavior/s…enough of that however.

This past Wednesday night in Charleston, SC a twenty-one year old white male walked into 200-year-old Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church and with malice & forethought shot dead nine black bible study participants. Forget for a moment the act as heinous and hateful as it was and concentrate on this, twenty-one years of age. Where and how does a twenty-one year old amass this much hatred for a race of people especially when his age alone testifies to the fact that his life experience with blacks could never justify such hate? There can only be one plausible explanation and that is perhaps this was a homeschooled curriculum.

Think about this folks. When you see archival footage of lynchings, dogs attacking blacks in the south, protestors blocking school doors and whites spitting and tossing rocks do you ever wonder where those people are now? Really, the majority of these people were white women that brought along their children to enjoy the spectacle of a black man being lynched. Some were white teenagers that enjoyed terrorizing lunch counter protestors, Freedom Riders or beating to death someone associated with the Civil Rights movement sans “Selma.” Where are those people now or better still where are their grandchildren and what were the lessons taught during the conversations around the dinner table?

Well, some are in Congress passing laws that reflect their values, e.g. voter suppression, denial of assistance, deciding what foods families are allowed to purchase (Kansas). Some are in the criminal justice system implementing those laws in ways that reflect their values, e.g. shooting folks down like the animals they view them as or handing down exaggerated sentences. Some are in the school system denying education to those they consider a threat to their perceived superiority, a direct reflection of their values. Some are sitting behind a desk denying work opportunities in an attempt to oppress the already oppressed, another reflection of values. Some are watching their grandchildren walk into a church and gun down nine people worshiping the very God upon whose word America claims to have built its foundational principles/values. Yeah, right.

Listen up folks and you will hear if you haven’t already people referring once again to the country’s need to have a serious conversation about race. This may come as a surprise to you folks but there is a serious conversation being had about race and therein lies the problem. Want to hear it? Get invited to dinner.

RIP brothers and sisters and pray the Father grant us some time to return to Him.

 
Written By Jay Arrington, Maryland Daily Examiner
For information regarding Maryland Daily Examiner, contact Reggie Kearney, Editor-in-Chief at reginald.kearney@marylanddailyexaminer.com


1 Comment

“Can You Break a Nigger? Let’s Check the Manual”

7/28/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Tragic comedy, that’s what the title represents. In 1979 when Richard Pryor performed the skit containing those words, the image of two police officers panicking after killing a black man by placing the man in a chokehold brought the house down with laughter. Yes, it was funny but the humor for whites in the audience differed from that of blacks in the audience. Whites in the audience laughed at Pryor’s imagery, his antics and his delivery, while blacks laughed at the image of two bumbling white police officers. No doubt however, no one laughed at the reality, but again not for the same reasons. Whites did not laugh at the reality because for them the scene Pryor spoke of never was a reality. Blacks did not laugh at the reality because for them it was and remains in 2014, reality. A reality, of which we were once again reminded on July 17, 2014, when NYPD police officers murdered Eric Garner. That’s right, murdered. Cut and dry murder with the assistance of negligent EMT workers.

I call it murder because the NYPD patrolman’s guide unlike the fictional police manual in Pryor’s routine which on page 8 allows for the ‘breaking of a nigger’, strictly prohibits officers from placing any suspect in a chokehold. Make no mistake about it this chokehold was not an accident. It was deliberate and done with malice and forethought. Between 2009 and 2013, the Civilian Complaint Review Board that investigates complaints against New York police officers, received 1022 complaints of police placing suspects in choke-holds. However, the agency fully investigated just 462 determining that only halve of those complaints were valid. Which begs the question, if less than fifty percent of complaints were investigated what message does this lack of urgency and concern send to police officers. Alas, I digress, on to the anger and the outrage.

In one of his more poignant moments during a routine Pryor reflects on the LAPD’s use of the chokehold and the weirdness of it all saying, "Police in L.A., man, they got a chokehold they use on @@##. Do they do it here, do they choke you to death? (Voices from the audience, many voices from the audience: `Yeah!') That's some weird @#*. Cause I didn't know it was a death penalty to have a parking ticket".  Scary, and ominously prophetic not so much because it was abnormal, but because it was and continues to be normal to, ‘break a nigger’ in the eyes of police officers. Moreover, as Pryor eluded too, the minor infractions over which a black man could lose his life, a parking ticket and now as in the case of Eric Garner, allegedly selling loose cigarettes. Furthermore, the callous and cavalier attitude taken by some over the death of a black man at the hands of police versus the death of a policeman at the hands of a civilian.

Now don’t for one second think that I am condoning the death of police officers. I abhor violence and cherish one life as much as the next. However, what I do not appreciate are snake oil salesmen, like Patrick J. Lynch, president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, consistently defending officers firing fifty or more rounds at unarmed suspects, or as Lynch likes to say, ‘animals’. In a statement Lynch called the decision by the police department to put Daniel Pantaleo, the officer shown in the video placing Garner in a chokehold on desk duty “completely unwarranted” and “absolutely wrong.” Reminds me of the used car salesperson who tells the customer the oil leaking beneath the car is black gold. New York City Mayor Bill deBlasio and Police Commissioner Bratton are throwing around cautionary words such as, purported and alleged, in addition to saying there is a full and ongoing investigation.

Moreover, the Civilian Complaint Board now has a new director, civil rights attorney Richard Emery appointed ironically the very day of Garner’s murder. During the announcement of his hiring Emery said, “Effective policing is by definition constitutional and respectful policing,” As it related to complaints of mistreatment from civilians against police officers Emery stressed the importance of “responding fairly and justly and quickly.”

Fairly, justly and quickly, does that sound reasonable to anyone given the history of police and blacks in this country. Yeah, I know, the answers will vary according to people’s reality. You know, white folks saying yes because for them fairly, justly and quickly is their reality and black folks will say no because fairly, justly and quickly is not part of their reality unless it’s done on behalf of white folks. I mean how much can the words ‘purported’ and ‘alleged’ really mean when the offense is captured on video, what is there to investigate. To hear liberals tell it we’re long past Rodney King as evidenced by Obama’s election and to hear conservatives tell it, at least the US Supreme Court, racism no longer exists as evidenced by Obama’s election. However, the only evidence that matters is what the video shows and it appears that might not even be enough.

Rodney King, Sean Bell, Amadou Diallo, Marlene Pinnock, Oscar Grant and now Eric Garner, and these are but a few on long exhaustive list of blacks victimized by overzealous and pampered police officers. “Enough is enough and too much will make a dog sick.”

Richard Pryor, as funny as his comedy was, it was also tragic and true. “Can you break a nigger?” “Let’s check the manual.” “Yup, page 8.”

Prayers for comfort for the Garner Family

Written by Jay Arrington
                 Maryland Daily Examiner

1 Comment

Just A Little Farther West

4/17/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
“Someday, somewhere, someone may find out the damn truth. We better. We better, or we might just as well build ourselves another government like the Declaration of Independence says to when the old one ain’t working — just a little farther out west.” 
                                                                                                                            ~~~ JFK the Movie

Conjecture notwithstanding, Oliver Stone’s movie “JFK” is perhaps one of my favorites, if for no other reason than its attempt to satisfy conspiracy theorists such as myself concerning the Kennedy assassination in Dallas. The aforementioned quote refers to the scene when New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, played by Kevin Costner gives his closing arguments in the only criminal trial presented in the matter. Garrison references the line in the Declaration of Independence that suggests that as citizens we continue to move forward in pursuit of establishing a government of the people, for the people and by the people when and if the current government fails to meet these objectives in any sense.

So in keeping with that notion of moving “just a little farther out west,” we set our sights on the state of Colorado where in March of this year, the Colorado Women’s Hall of fame inducted 10 women. I make no efforts here to critique in any way the merits for induction nor will I infer that any accomplishments considered do not warrant inclusion into what I am sure is a fine organization. That said however, there is one inductee that I along with several others take exception to and that is Federal Judge Christine Arguello. Reading the introductory bio about Judge Arguello on the Hall of Fame website makes quite the impression and highlights the many ‘firsts’ in Judge Arguello’s storied career.

However, while the accomplishments of Judge Arguello made, and continue to make members of her family proud there are at least six families who do not judge the judge from that perspective. In fact, I would venture to say the families of The IRP6, (Kendrick Barnes, Gary L Walker, Demetrius K. Harper, Clinton A Stewart, David A Zirpolo and David A Banks) see the Hall of Shame as a more appropriate place to honor Judge Arguello. For those of you familiar with the saga of the IRP6, you know the accusations brought by the IRP6 regarding Judge Arguello’s handling of the case. In particular, the missing 200 pages of transcript purportedly containing evidence that Judge Arguello violated the 5th Amendment rights of the IRP6 during trial and Judge Arguello’s refusal to make those transcripts available for purposes of appeal.

According to court transcripts, court reporter Darlene Martinez confirmed that she (Martinez) failed to include more than 200 pages of transcripts pertaining to the prosecution of the IRP6. Moreover, Judge Arguello refused to make those missing pages available to the defense for appeal. Court records reveal the following exchange between Martinez and Judge Arguello,“First of all, the unedited version (of the transcript) cannot be used for any purpose… how many pages is it?” Martinez affirms, “Over 200 pages.” Judge Arguello further states, “Over 200 pages…for no purpose that I can see that would be served by having that at this time.” “I am not going to have an expedited, and unedited version (of the transcript) delivered to the defendants (IRP6)”, concludes Arguello. (D. Ct. No. 1:09-CR-00266-CMA, October 2011, Court transcript pages 2062 -2063)

Perhaps it’s just me but I was under the impression that relevance of evidence as it relates to appeal be established by the appeals court, not the presiding judge on the original case. The only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from Judge Arguello’s actions suggests an attempt to cover her error. Unlike Judge Arguello who somehow channels a hidden clairvoyance in regards to what is relevant for appeal, I will make no claims as to knowing her state of mind. Benefit of the doubt notwithstanding, if touting the judge’s many accomplishments and her acumen concerning Jurist Prudence validates her induction into the Colorado Women’s Hall of Fame, should we not then presume she knows better concerning the missing transcripts and the sidebar conversation therein.

Abraham Lincoln once said, “Any man can withstand adversity but if you want to test a man’s character give him power.” The reason this is so important is that power reveals any holes in claims of those who say where they came from to where they are humbles them. Humility should if genuine, cultivate compassion and fairness especially for someone with the power to destroy the lives of others and their families. Proper function of any system is dependent on those who work the system more so than policy and it is no different as it relates to the criminal justice system. The adage “you get out what you put in” has never been more apropos than in the courtroom. So then, if we are indeed putting justice and fairness ‘first’ as Judge Arguello likes to be associated with, should we not then get out what we put into the system.

We can only hope and pray the truth will one day come out. In fact, we know that it will. It better or we might just as well build ourselves another government like the Declaration of Independence says to when the old one ain’t working — just a little farther out west.

~~~ Jay Arrington (Maryland Daily Examiner)

- See more at: http://www.marylanddailyexaminer.com/just-little-farther-west/#sthash.86RHM2M3.dpuf



0 Comments

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Fifty Years Later: Nothing Civil About it

4/15/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
“While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.” 2 Peter 2:19 


When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed the United States Congress, no doubt many who voted in favor of the bill never envisioned the consequences of its passage. Never in their wildest dreams could they have imagined the advancements the bill would afford women, immigrants (illegal or otherwise), gays, and most certainly blacks. Surely, very few if any foresaw that fifty years later America would have its first black President and first black US Attorney General. Hence, the significance of the above referenced scripture. Because if we examine the recent assaults on several of the protections afforded by the legislation, we see a section of the country gradually brought into bondage by that which it is overcome, power. 

You see, the very thing The Civil Rights Act of 1964 promised those of muted voice, power, is now the very thing many are in fear of losing and are therefore making every attempt to render moot the most crucial protections of the legislation. History if nothing else shows that man is more willing to share power when it poses no serious threat to his own. However, when the sharing of power becomes a threat man is not always as eager to share or relinquish his power. Think about it, the Civil War epitomized both sides of the power issue. For confederates, emancipation of slaves meant they (confederates) would no longer enjoy the power and life of leisure that slavery afforded and therefore were willing to defend to the death the right to hold on to that power. For those in the north however, whose power had no correlation to slavery and therefore felt no threat, defending its (slavery) abolition was a moral issue. 

In order to achieve passage of The Civil Rights Act of 1964, President Johnson not unlike President Lincoln with the 13th Amendment relied heavily on the votes of the rival party for passage of the bill. Although there exist no empirical evidence to support this theory, there were no doubt some of the opposing party who voted in favor of the bill because of some quid pro quo with President Johnson more so than out of any fervent belief in the bill itself. The point being again that no threat to power arose to impede the sharing of power. Fast-forward to present day America and we find those in power operating from the Monday morning armchair of the survivalist…brought into bondage by that which he is overcome, power. 

At its core, the Civil Rights Act by law eliminated discrimination based on color, religion, sex, national origin and race. In addition, and most importantly for purposes of this discussion the law did away with discriminatory voter registration requirements. With more than thirty states passing restrictive voter ID laws over the past few years in addition to last year’s SCOTUS 5-4 decision to gut the Voting Rights Act of 1965, one does not have to be a Rhodes Scholar to figure out what is going on. The rules for sharing power have changed particularly since those rules now threaten to render moot the power of those accustomed to welding said power for their own advancement. As a result, as previously mentioned, many statehouses across the country have passed restrictive voter ID laws which target in large part the voting rights of the very people the Civil Rights Act targeted for protection, blacks. 

Not surprisingly, these voter suppression efforts are concentrated in republican lead statehouses and intensified with the election of President Obama. Furthermore, attacks on women’s rights to control their own bodies relative to reproductive issues, stand your ground laws, the failure of Congress to pass sensible gun legislation, denial of livable wages and efforts to deny healthcare to Americans, again are indicative of an emerging pattern. Each of the aforementioned issues effect as a majority low income Americans, mainly blacks. Stand your ground laws result in a disproportionate number of black victims and, exonerated white defendants. Denial of affordable healthcare, access to birth control, abortions, and livable wages disproportionately affect minority/lower income women thereby increasing economic hardships and the odds against realizing the American Dream…another threat to power. 

Finally, the light shines on the portion of the bill that symbolizes its role within society and that is the word ‘Civil’. The word civil indicates that regardless of personal beliefs citizens display a tolerance (civility) toward fairness in society and recognize that all men have equal protection under the law. Unfortunately, civility cannot be legislated. Respect for the humanity of others does not exist as a subsection of a House Resolution or within the bylaws of a charter. The election of President Obama revealed that when threatened with extinction a species will use any arrow in its survivalist quiver to hold on to power and ensure its survival. Comments never uttered to or about a president from the floor of Congress to the floors of town hall meetings, cable news shows, and right wing radio permeate the airwaves as the ‘new normal’ of incivility without so much as a whisper of reprimand from so-called republican leaders. To the contrary, the most incendiary comments spew from elected representatives who tell the President, “You lie,” or insinuate that Attorney General Holder be in jail, others even going so far as to say they can’t stand to be near the President or to even look at him.  

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 fifty years later, and were it not for the bill’s existence one would never know from our behavior that America ever attempted to address societal fairness and equality. Quite frankly, “There is nothing civil about it.” 


~~~ Jay Arrington, Featured Writer
        Maryland Daily Examiner  


 See more at: http://www.marylanddailyexaminer.com/civil-rights-act-1964-fifty-years-later-nothing-civil/#sthash.s28X6t5k.dpuf

0 Comments

    Jay Arrington

    Jay Arrington is a featured staff writer and reporter for the Maryland Daily Examiner.  

    Jay's political commentary is cutting edge, and stands on truth and justice.  

    An activist and advocate for civil rights and a fair judicial system, Jay reports with the conviction of equality for all. 

    Jay Arrington's EMAIL

    Archives

    July 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    March 2013

    Categories

    All
    Civil Rights
    Gun Control
    Journalism
    Judicial Injustice
    Laws
    Life
    Politics
    Racism/Prejudice
    Religion
    Voting/Voting Rights

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.